NIL money in college athletics creating "have-not" sports [ CBS Evening News ]

Report Was In Error: Freshman Enrollment Did Not Decline 5% Last Fall [ Forbes ]

The flava:

The National Student Clearinghouse Research Center today released the following statement from Executive Director Doug Shapiro about an error that affected the freshman enrollment data in its October preliminary fall enrollment report:

“The National Student Clearinghouse Research Center has identified a methodological error affecting its calculation of freshman enrollment in the preliminary enrollment report released in October 2024. That report, called the Stay Informed Report, is based on data provided by 50 percent of higher education institutions. The error in research methodology caused the mislabeling of certain students as dual-enrolled rather than as freshmen, and as a result, the number of freshmen was undercounted, and the number of dual-enrolled was overcounted. The error also affected the Special Analysis of 18-year-old Freshmen report released in November.”

The initially reported 5% drop in freshman enrollment was widely covered in news outlets and cited by numerous commentators over the past few months. . . .  

The article:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaeltnietzel/2025/01/13/report-was-in-error-freshman-enrollment-did-not-decline-5-last-fall/

John Aubrey Douglass: Leading a university is set to become even more difficult.

Over the past five years or so, there has been a significant increase in faculty votes of no confidence in their university and college presidents in the United States. These votes are an indicator of an evolving and increasingly challenging environment for university and college leadership, as well as evidence of a decline in shared governance – an environment that will likely become even more complex with Donald Trump’s return to the White House.

One mega trend: over some five or more decades, management authority has drifted towards university and college presidents and their administrators for several reasons. One is the growing size and role of student support services and other administrative functions, including the rising costs of intercollegiate sports and bureaucracies related to governmental reporting requirements, health and safety and supporting academic research.

In the 1960s, for example, faculty outnumbered administrators. Now, depending on the institution, administrators often outnumber faculty by five to one, or more. Today, a significant portion of a campus’s operations and funding is not directly related to its teaching, research and public service mission.

Another reason is the financial and enrolment pressures that, on average, have meant shrinking revenues relative to costs – even with rising tuition rates. With many institutions in the US facing declining enrolment, budgetary challenges often mean reducing the number of degree programmes, laying off faculty and administrators, and other actions that are sometimes accomplished despite resistance and concerns over shared governance. . . . 

--John Aubrey Douglass, senior research fellow for public policy and higher education at the Center for Studies in Higher Education, Goldman School of Public Policy, University of California, Berkeley

American Historical Assoc. Votes Overwhelmingly for Resolution to Oppose Scholasticide in Gaza [ Democracy Now! ]

Community colleges gear up to train workers for America’s proposed manufacturing future [ PBS NewsHour ]

From Teacher to OnlyFans Millionaire-Brianna [ Soft White Underbelly ]

Michael S. Roth on elitism and education

We will always have elites — some deserving, some not — and we will always have anti-elitists — some civic-minded, some cynical. Constitutional democracy doesn’t work if people are stuck in the station they’re born into, and education can still be an effective lubricant, and a powerful corrective to entrenched inequality.

Like the founders, we can be anti-elitists without falling into the trap of being anti-education. We’ll have to create pathways that change the opportunity structures for our fellow citizens, wherever they live and wherever, or whether, their parents went to school.

--Michael S. Roth, President of Wesleyan University

Are we becoming a post-literate society? [ FT.com ]

The flava:

“Human intelligence,” the cultural critic Neil Postman once wrote, “is among the most fragile things in nature. It doesn’t take much to distract it, suppress it, or even annihilate it.”

The year was 1988, a former Hollywood actor was in the White House, and Postman was worried about the ascendancy of pictures over words in American media, culture and politics. Television “conditions our minds to apprehend the world through fragmented pictures and forces other media to orient themselves in that direction,” he argued in an essay in his book Conscientious Objections. “A culture does not have to force scholars to flee to render them impotent. A culture does not have to burn books to assure that they will not be read . . . There are other ways to achieve stupidity.”

What might have seemed curmudgeonly in 1988 reads more like prophecy from the perspective of 2024. This month, the OECD released the results of a vast exercise: in-person assessments of the literacy, numeracy and problem-solving skills of 160,000 adults aged 16-65 in 31 different countries and economies. . . .

The article:

https://www.ft.com/content/e2ddd496-4f07-4dc8-a47c-314354da8d46

Colleges advise some international students to return to U.S. before Trump takes office [ PBS NewsHour ]

The Scientists Versus Dartmouth: Inside a Sexual Harassment Scandal That Shook Science to Its Core [ Scientific American ]